Our method, stated plainly, and an open door to disagree with it.
Review a platformA rating is only worth the method behind it. Ours is deliberately narrow: we score what a user can verify, we say where we are unsure, and we publish reader reviews next to our own scores even when they contradict us. Below is the whole of it.
Every platform is scored on the same six axes, and readers rate the same six. That is what makes the two comparable, criterion by criterion, on every review page.
No platform can buy a ranking, a score or a place on this site. We have refused paid placement, and we say so here rather than in a footer nobody reads. When a score changes, it is because our testing changed, not because a payout did.
One exception, stated here rather than buried: a platform sometimes reaches our catalogue before we have been able to open it. Its page then says so at the top, carries no criterion scores, and is updated once we have used it. We would rather show a gap than a number we did not measure.
We do earn a commission when a reader signs up through our links, and that funds the testing. It is disclosed on every outbound link and explained in full on our affiliate disclosure.
We test each platform for days. You may have lived with one for months, which is exactly where the things we cannot see appear: what the memory does after week three, what happens to billing when you cancel, whether the enthusiasm of the first week survives.
Every review is read by a person before publication. We do not remove a review for being negative, and we do not publish one that looks planted. No account is required and your email, if you leave one, is never displayed.